ཤོག་བུའི་རྟགས། 149a

Left text panel, first line.

The visible verbal phrase begins with བར་; its preceding element is absent from this page and has not been supplied. The translation therefore remains a fragment. The ornamental opening sign is represented conventionally as ༄༅།.

Right text panel, first line; continuation of L1.

རབ་དཀར་ continues into L2; no missing noun has been inserted into the Tibetan.

Left text panel, second line; continuation of R1.

བ་དན་ is read from the image as 'pennant'; the OCR hint corrupts this sequence. The final བསྟན་ continues as པའི་ at the beginning of R2. English and Russian fragments follow the Tibetan syntax across panel boundaries.

Right text panel, second line; continuation of L2.

མངོན་པར་ is a tentative visual reading; the compact letters are less clear than the surrounding text. བཞིན་ continues with དུ་ in L3.

Left text panel, third line; continuation of R2 and beginning of the colophon.

ཞི་བར་ continues with གཤེགས་པ་ in R3. The English and Russian anticipate that continuation only to make the fragment intelligible. The unusually shaped punctuation after དུ་ is represented as ༑.

Right text panel, third line; continuation of L3.

The foreign-name spelling ཧོ་ལཎྜའི་ is tentative, especially the conjunct ཎྜ; ནྡ is a possible reading. 'Holland' is the corresponding tentative interpretation. The function of the donor name becomes clear only with the sponsorship wording in L4. No date or identity beyond the printed name is supplied.

Left text panel, fourth and smallest line; continuation of R3.

The small-script name after མཁན་པོ་ cannot be read securely. འཛི་དགོན་ is a possible reading, not an established transcription. The writer's designation continues into R4. The panel boundary is not treated as a sentence-ending double shad. དབྱིན་ཇི་ identifies an English/British association; 'English' and 'из Англии' are provisional renderings, not independently verified biographical information.

Right text panel, fourth and smallest line; continuation of L4 and closing colophon.

The syllable after ནོར་ is unresolved; the OCR suggests ག་, but the image does not establish it securely. The complete personal or institutional designation spanning L4–R4 remains uncertain. The place-name portion between ཀུ་ལུ་ and ལི་ is unresolved. The OCR suggests མུན་; it has not been silently normalized to a familiar place name. པར་ may denote the print/edition or printing blocks. 'Print' is retained provisionally; the precise physical referent is not established. སྒྲུབ་སྡེ་ is translated literally as 'practice community', without identifying a particular institution.

Caption below the left illustration.

The name is transliterated, not replaced by an identification inferred from the illustration. The ornamental opening sign is represented conventionally.

Caption below the central stupa illustration.

ཆེ་ is retained as printed; it is not expanded to ཆེན་པོ་. The final letters are faint, but this is the tentative visual reading.

Caption below the right illustration.

བཀའ་སྡོད་ is read visually; it is not normalized to a different conventional epithet. The ornamental opening sign and closing shads are represented conventionally.

Narrow left margin, vertical in the supplied image; read after rotating counterclockwise.

The small sign or syllable following ཞེ་དགུ་ is unresolved; the OCR suggests བྱོན་, which is not accepted as certain. The title is retained as the visible marginal form མི་ལའི་རྣམ་ཐར་; no expanded title is supplied. The spacing separates the volume marker, folio number, and marginal title; it does not represent a continuous sentence.

Handwritten Arabic numerals outside the upper-left frame.

This is a non-Tibetan page annotation, included for coverage. The OCR hint's '202' is rejected by visual inspection.

Printed modern folio label outside the upper-right frame.

This modern label is not part of the Tibetan text.