string: ནས[?]; note: The opening fragment is isolated after the page-opening ornament. Its reading is uncertain; the preceding sentence is unavailable.; alternatives: ['ནས', "ནའང — the OCR hint's reading"] string: འདྲི་ན[?]; note: The interrogative verb is readable, but the following ན is not securely distinguished in the print. The conditional translation is provisional.; alternatives: ['འདྲི་ན', 'འདྲི followed directly by དྲི་བ'] string: ད་ལྟ་[?]; note: ད་ལྟ is readable. The remaining line-end characters and punctuation are unresolved. The OCR gives ད་ལྟ་བས་ལ; that ending has not been adopted as an established reading.; alternatives: [] string: རུས / རིགས / ཇོ་སྲས; note: The Tibetan terms are retained without identifying a historical genealogy. English 'clan' and 'family' are provisional distinctions between རུས and རིགས. Jo-sras is transliterated; Russian Джосэ is an approximate pronunciation.; alternatives: []
string: ལས་ཀྱི་གཞི་[?] མི་འགྱུར་བ་ཞིག་ཡིན་ཞིང་; note: The dense span between གཞི and མི་འགྱུར cannot be transcribed securely. The marker represents an unspecified number of syllables, not a single missing character. Consequently, the grammatical connection between 'the basis of karma' and 'something unchanging' remains unresolved. No complete doctrinal statement has been reconstructed.; alternatives: [] string: ལ་ལ་ངུ་བྲོ / ལ་ལ་དགོད་བྲོ; note: The image supports the weeping/laughing contrast. The OCR's additional ནི particles were not retained because they were not securely visible.; alternatives: [] Editor: The reader explicitly left the grammatical relation unresolved. Separate the two fragments so the draft does not assert that karma's basis is unchanging. Restore the exact [?] marker in both pivot languages. Tibetan is unchanged.
string: ཕྱག་བཙལ[?]; note: The act of bowing or prostrating is clear, but the exact written form of its verb is uncertain. The OCR form is retained provisionally rather than silently standardized.; alternatives: ['ཕྱག་བཙལ', 'ཕྱག་འཚལ'] string: ཞེ་བཅད་; note: The expression continues with དྲག་པོས at the start of line 4; it is not a complete sentence here.; alternatives: []
string: མི་འགྱུར་བའི་ངང་ནས་འགྱུ་བའི[?]; note: This is a provisional visual reading of the crowded final clause. In particular, ངང་ནས and the final verbal form require expert verification. The translation follows this candidate and must remain marked uncertain.; alternatives: ['འགྱུ་བའི', 'འགྱུར་བའི'] string: གནས་ལུགས / ཆོས་རྣམས་ཟད་ས; note: The translations remain literal working renderings. No additional doctrinal interpretation of these expressions is supplied.; alternatives: []
string: མི་སྐྱོད་པ[?]; note: The reading 'not moving' is provisional. The exact consonant group and final consonant of སྐྱོད require verification. No interpretation such as 'unshakable realization' has been substituted for the uncertain wording.; alternatives: ['མི་སྐྱོད་པ', 'མི་སྐྱོ་བ'] string: བར་; note: Continues as བར་དུ across the line break, with དུ at the beginning of line 6.; alternatives: []
string: བདག་སོགས་སེམས་ཅན་ཐམས་ཅད་ལ་ཐུགས་བརྩེ་བ་ཆེན་པོས་དགོངས་ཏེ།; note: The image places this clause after ཡོད་པ་ལགས་པས. The OCR output displaced it before the beginning of line 6. Its image order is restored here.; alternatives: [] string: དགོངས་ཏེ།; note: This is a continuing construction. The remainder of the request is not present on this page and has not been supplied.; alternatives: []
この葉をどう読むか
MatreyaがAIの支援を受けて作成した編集上の解釈であり、専門家による確認は受けていません。原文の翻訳とは別のもので、教義についての権威ある注釈ではありません。
ミラレパは、以前の黒業と後の白業を対比させます。レチュンパは、他者の益となるよう、その事情を語ってほしいと求めます。続く箇所の文法的な解釈は未解決です。そこから、業が不変であるとも、倫理的責任を免れるとも結論づけることはできません。
この読みの根拠となる箇所: I1CZ20410019-L1 · I1CZ20410019-L2 · I1CZ20410019-L3 · I1CZ20410019-L6