སྙོམས་ལས་[?]: uncertain spelling; སྙོམ་ལས་ is an alternative. The tentative sense is inactivity or indolence; spelling is not silently normalized. ཁྱེད་འདིར་འཚོགས་ཀྱི་[?]: central ink merging affects the exact letters and particle; the reading is provisional. ཉན་མ་[?]: provisional ‘listeners’; the second syllable is not fully secure. The same expression appears in L2. ཀྱང་ངའི་[?]: provisional reading of the small cluster preceding གསོལ་བ; the OCR's ཁྱད་པའི་ does not securely match the image. The line ends with པའི་; ‘assistance’ belongs to the next image line.
The [?] after དེར་ is an unreadable span, not a single missing syllable. The OCR proposes སྲས་བུཚིན་; some strokes may support སྲས་, but the full designation cannot be confirmed under the heavy ink. དད་ཅན་ is visually preferable to OCR ནད་ཅན་; this is not translated as ‘sick people’. ཉན་མ་[?]: same uncertain designation as L1. After སྐྱེས་བུ་དམ་པ་, the letters before ཆུང་ cannot be reliably resolved. OCR suggests དེས་; this has not been adopted as established text. The literal fragment ‘small/young’ is retained without inventing its referent.
Initial པས་ completes the preceding line's unresolved expression; the identity or grammatical role of the supplicant is not supplied. ཆོས་ཀྱི་འཁོར་ལོ་ is readable. The sequence བསྐོར་དུ་གསོལ་ཞེས་[?] is provisional because the middle of the line is heavily overprinted; the request to turn the Dharma wheel is clearer than its exact syllable sequence. Final ཡིད་[?] is provisional; OCR has ཡད་. The following line begins འཛིན།. The English and Russian connect these across the line break without treating the uncertain vowel as settled.
དབུས་ནུབ་བྱང་ཕྱོགས་[?]: provisional reconstruction of visible but merged letters, aided by OCR དབུ་ནུབྱང་ཕྱོགས་. The exact geographical qualification remains uncertain. ཁྲོད། is preferred from the image; OCR inserts ནས་ here, which has not been retained. རུས་ཁྱུང་པོ། is supported by the image, unlike OCR རུས་ཁྱད་པ།. ཇོ་སྲས་[?]: provisional name or title, repeated in L6. Its precise interpretation is not established. ‘Old mantra tradition’ renders the visible སྔགས་རྙིང་མ་པ་ without supplying additional lineage history.
སྔགས་ནུས་[?]: provisional; the image appears to support mantra power more strongly than OCR དག་ནུས་, but the first syllable is not secure. The central pilgrimage phrase has thick merged strokes; its readable wording is rendered, without identifying particular shrines or places. གཅོད་ལ་སྟོད་བྱང་[?]: geographical reading is provisional, especially the first syllable; transliteration in the translations does not identify a modern place. The [?] after ཕྱོགས་ covers a particle and the unreadable place-name. OCR suggests གཅུང་བསྤྱི་; possible visible components include གཅུང་/དུང་ and བྱི་, but no complete reading is secure. བར་[?] before ཕྱག་ཕེབས་: final r is uncertain; བ་ is an alternative.
ཕན་ཤིན་ཏུ་[?]: provisional reading of the merged central cluster; OCR has པན་བཞིན་ཏུ་. The extent of benefit is clear enough for a tentative translation, but the exact letters require review. ཇོ་སྲས་[?]: provisional name/title; OCR has ཛེསྲས་. No identification with a known historical figure is imposed. ལོ་འགའ་[?]: ‘several years’ is provisional; OCR ལོ་བགའ་ is corrupt. The number/duration should be checked by a Tibetan reader. Final བཞུགས་པས། is connective; the next event is not present on this page and has not been supplied.
如何阅读这张书叶
这是 Matreya 借助 AI 编写的编者解读,尚未经专家审阅。它与原文的翻译分列,并非具有权威性的教义注释。
如何阅读这张书叶
这是 Matreya 借助 AI 编写的编者解读,尚未经专家审阅。它与原文的翻译分列,并非具有权威性的教义注释。
聚集的听众一同提出请求。米拉日巴同意讲述,并从家系与祖先说起。因此,这个故事被呈现为对听众的回应,而不仅仅是成就的罗列。
此解读所依据的段落: L1 · L3 · L4